- O’Connor said the protections violated the Administrative Procedure Act.
- The healthcare act was passed in 2010, although its provisions have been phased in incrementally.
US District Judge Reed O’Connor in Texas halted the protections for their treatments and also also also for abortion-related services, siding with the state of Texas against the Obama administration on Saturday.
“Plaintiffs claim the Rule’s interpretation of sex discrimination pressures doctors to deliver healthcare in a manner which violates their religious freedom and also also also thwarts their independent medical judgment and also also also will require burdensome improvements to their health insurance plans on January 1, 2017,” O’Connor wrote. “Plaintiffs argue the brand new regulation will require them to perform and also also also provide insurance coverage for gender transitions and also also also abortions, regardless of their contrary religious beliefs or medical judgment.”
O’Connor said the protections violated the Administrative Procedure Act.
White House spokeswoman Katie Hill described the judge’s decision as a “setback.”
“Today’s decision is actually a setback, although hopefully a temporary one, since all Americans — regardless of their sex, gender identity or sexual orientation — should have access to quality, affordable health care free coming from discrimination,” Hill said.
The state of Texas perennially files many lawsuits against what which sees as federal overreach. Republicans in Congress have promised to scrap the Affordable Care Act, and also also also President-elect Donald Trump has vowed to sign the repeal, though which is actually unclear what healthcare bill Republicans will pass, if any, to replace which.
President Barack Obama’s signature health care law, the Affordable Care Act, was passed in 2010, although its provisions have been phased in incrementally.