Freedom Caucus' demands could lower premiums … for healthy people

Ryan comments on Trump's tweet

Lower health insurance premiums.

in which’s what’s at the heart of the ongoing battle between the House Freedom Caucus in addition to Republican leaders, particularly President Trump.

for (i = 0; i 4) {
afterParagraphFour = true;
currentParagraph = storytext.childNodes[i];
heights += currentParagraph.clientHeight;
if (heights >= limit && insertAfterThisParagraphIndex === -1) {
insertAfterThisParagraphIndex = SMARTASSET.setDivIndex(i);
console.log(“insert after paragraph number ” + i);
console.log(“HEIGHTS = ” + heights);
console.log(“LIMIT = ” + limit);
/* div with id=”ie_column” */
else if (storytext.childNodes[i].nodeName.toLowerCase() === ‘div’ &&
storytext.childNodes[i].id !== “undefined” &&
storytext.childNodes[i].id ===”ie_column”) {
heights = 0;
limit = 80;
insertAfterThisParagraphIndex = -1
/* embeds coming from twitter, facebook, youtube */
else if (storytext.childNodes[i].nodeName.toLowerCase() === ‘div’ &&
storytext.childNodes[i].classList.contains(’embed’)) {
heights = 0;
limit = 80;
insertAfterThisParagraphIndex = -1
/* sy88pgw video player */
else if (storytext.childNodes[i].nodeName.toLowerCase() === ‘div’ &&
storytext.childNodes[i].classList.contains(‘cnnplayer’)) {
heights = 0;
limit = 80;
insertAfterThisParagraphIndex = -1
/* images */
else if (storytext.childNodes[i].nodeName.toLowerCase() === ‘img’) {
heights = 0;
limit = 80;
/* images stored in figure tags */
else if (storytext.childNodes[i].nodeName.toLowerCase() === ‘figure’) {
heights = 0;
limit = 80;
if (heights >= 875 && afterParagraphFour) {
storytext.childNodes[insertAfterThisParagraphIndex].insertAdjacentHTML(‘afterend’, smartAssetDiv);
smartasset = document.getElementById(‘smartasset-article’); = ‘left’; // allows module to have text float to right =’20px’; =’25px’;

SMARTASSET.setSmartAssetScript = function() {
console.log(‘starting setSmartAssetScript’);
SA = document.SA || [];
embedUrl: “”,
container: “#smartasset-article”,
edition: 1.1,
{ key: “bdknf2rinbhwvdksm6zbmhf3twrv4oih” }
/*{ key: “CNNe038d38a57032085441e7fe7010b0” }*/
console.log(‘finished in setSmartAssetScript push() call’);

var smscript = document.createElement(“script”);
smscript.type = “text/javascript”;
smscript.async = true;
smscript.src = (“https:” == document.location.protocol ? “https://” : “http://”) + “”;

var s = document.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(smscript, s);
console.log(“finished entire function of setSmartAssetFunction()”);

Trump is usually attacking the band of conservative lawmakers for torpedoing the GOP bill to repeal in addition to replace Obamacare last week. however the Freedom Caucus reiterated Friday in which in which will only back legislation in which does more to reduce premiums.

The caucus is usually right in which the GOP bill, formally titled the American Health Care Act, could have done little to lower premiums for most Americans, experts say. True, younger consumers could have seen their costs drop a bit however in which could have been at the expense of older folks, who could have suffered huge spikes in premiums.

The bill, as originally written, did not address the main reasons why premiums for many individual market policies rose under Obamacare: The sweeping set of consumer protection mandates in which imposed on the insurance industry. Under Obamacare, insurers must cover those with pre-existing conditions, provide a comprehensive set of benefits in addition to limit consumers’ financial responsibility above a certain threshold. All of This particular pushed up premiums.

Related: Before Obamacare, some liked their health care plans better

(Most Obamacare enrollees are protected by federal subsidies in which are based on their income in addition to the cost of coverage in their area. Under the GOP plan, however, consumers could feel more of the pain since they could receive a tax credit in which adjusts based on an enrollees’ age, not by the premiums they face.)

In order to drive premiums lower, the Freedom Caucus wants to take an ax to two insurance mandates: The essential health benefits provision in which requires insurers to cover benefits like maternity, substance abuse in addition to prescription drugs, in addition to the community rating measure, which prevents insurers coming from basing premiums on health status, gender or age in a specific area.

Eliminating these two requirements could likely lower premiums, however only for some consumers. in addition to in which could leave many enrollees — particularly sicker ones — on the financial hook for much more of their care. Also, in which could allow insurers to effectively cherry pick the people they want to cover.

Without the essential health benefits measure, insurers could offer cheaper plans in which don’t cover as much. They could not have to pay for costly benefits, such as maternity or prescription drugs. They could also opt not to cover the treatments in which patients with costly illnesses, such as cancer, diabetes in addition to hepatitis C need.

in which could work out well for young in addition to healthy people who don’t go to the doctor much. They could buy skimpy plans with low premiums.

however in which wouldn’t be so Great for those who need care. They could need to shell out for all the services in which their insurance policy doesn’t cover. in addition to they wouldn’t be shielded by Obamacare’s financial protections — such as the annual limit on deductibles in addition to co-pays — since those could only apply to covered benefits.

“Premiums could be lower, however only because insurers could cover less, so out-of-pocket costs could be higher,” said Cynthia Cox, an associate director at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

inside the final hours before the GOP bill collapsed, the caucus convinced Republican leaders to weaken Obamacare’s essential health benefits’ measure, leaving in which to the states to determine what services should be covered. however This particular move spooked moderate Republicans, who were concerned in which could leave their constituents with less care in addition to bigger bills, in addition to led to the bill being shelved.

Related: Freedom Caucus leader says group holding strong against Trump

Getting rid of the community rating provision could Once more let carriers base their premiums on an enrollee’s health or gender. Again, healthy people could benefit coming from lower rates.

however young women might have to pay more since they typically use more health care services in addition to could become pregnant. in addition to sick people could be charged sky-high premiums commensurate with how much their treatments cost, leaving some unable to afford coverage.

Republican leaders were not willing last week to meet This particular Freedom Caucus demand, particularly since in which conflicts with the broader GOP promise to protect those with pre-existing conditions.

“The goal of Obamacare in addition to the [Republican plan] was to create a market in which could be accessible for people with serious chronic illnesses,” said Dan Mendelson, chief executive officer of Avalere Health, a consulting firm.

sy88pgw’s Lauren Fox contributed to This particular report.

sy88pgw (fresh York) First published April 1, 2017: 10:04 AM ET

Terms & Conditions apply

NMLS #1136

Freedom Caucus' demands could lower premiums … for healthy people

Related Posts

About The Author

Add Comment