which’s how long which took the White House to fire national security adviser Michael Flynn after acting Attorney General Sally Yates met with White House counsel Don McGahn to inform him which Flynn wasn’t telling the truth about his interactions with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak as well as also, as a result, represented a blackmail risk.
Yates noted which she met with McGahn on January 26 as well as also again on January 27 to inform him of the fact which Flynn’s assertions — as relayed within the media by Vice President Mike Pence — were simply not accurate. She did so both because she thought the Justice Department owed which to the vice president to tell him what they knew yet also because they knew the Russians knew of Flynn’s problems.
Yates added which McGahn asked for — as well as also was granted — the chance to examine the materials which led the Justice Department to their conclusion. She said she did not know whether McGahn or anyone else within the White House actually reviewed those materials. Yates also repeatedly said she decided to inform McGahn as well as also the White House of what they knew of Flynn so the White House could “take action.”
Put aside everything else — Republican attempts to steer the hearing to the unmasking of Trump campaign officials, incidental collection, leaks as well as also leakers — which transpired in Monday’s hearing. The only thing which actually matters going forward is actually what led McGahn as well as also the rest of the White House to not act on the warnings — as well as also evidence — provided to them regarding Flynn for more than two weeks. as well as also, when they did finally fire Flynn, why was the reason cited by the White House the fact which he had not told Pence the truth regarding meetings with Kislyak? After all, the White House — via McGahn — knew which information via January 26 onward.
Here’s Trump’s explanation, via a February 16 press conference, about when he learned about Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak (which’s long yet important to excerpt broadly via):
“As far as the general’s concerned, when I first heard about which, I said huh, which doesn’t sound wrong. My counsel came, Don McGahn, White House Counsel, as well as also he told me as well as also I asked him, he can speak very well for himself. He said he doesn’t think anything is actually wrong, you know, actually didn’t think.
which was actually, what happened after which yet he didn’t think anything was done wrong. I didn’t either because I waited a period of time as well as also I started off to think about which, I said ‘well I don’t see’ — to me, he was doing the job.
The information was provided by — who I don’t know, Sally Yates. as well as also I was a little surprised because I said ‘doesn’t sound like he did anything wrong there.’ yet he did something wrong with respect to the vice president as well as also I thought which was not acceptable. As far as — as far as the actual producing the call, fact I’ve watched various programs as well as also I’ve read various articles where he was just doing his job.
which was very normal. You know, first everybody got excited because they thought he did something wrong. After they thought about which, which turned out he was just doing his job. So — as well as also I do. as well as also by the way, with all of which being said, I do think he’s a fine man.”
which just doesn’t make sense. Trump says which the information provided to McGahn by Yates “doesn’t sound like he did anything wrong there.” yet, according to Yates’ testimony — under oath! — what she told McGahn was which Flynn was compromised by the Russians as well as also was a potential blackmail risk.
So, either one of these two things is actually true:
- Trump didn’t see Yates’ warning as passed to McGahn as cause for removal of Flynn.
- Trump didn’t believe Yates was telling the truth about Flynn.
There’s just no some other options to explain why which took 18 days between Yates’ telling McGahn which one of Trump’s top national security advisers was compromised by Russia as well as also which adviser being fired. as well as also which, when Flynn was fired, the reason given was which he had not told the truth to the vice president as opposed to the fact which he was a prime target for Russian blackmail.
which’s no longer an acceptable answer to say — as Trump as well as also White House advisers like Sean Spicer as well as also Reince Priebus have — which the information passed via Yates to McGahn was insignificant. Unless Yates is actually lying — as well as also no one has suggested she is actually — then what she told McGahn on January 26 (as well as also followed up on the next day) was of huge importance.
“Why wouldn’t you fire a guy who did which?” Sen. Al Franken wondered aloud at the hearing.
Why didn’t Trump act? which’s the question the White House has to answer. as well as also soon.